Professionalism Task Forces

MS1/MS2 Task Force	MS3/MS4 Task force	Composite Task Force
Members Arrel Toews, Biochemistry and Biophysics Edward Kernick, Cell & Development Biology Alice Ma, Hematology/Oncology Alan Cross, Social Medicine Bruce Alexander, Microbiology & Immunology Kathleen Rao, Genetics Ellen Roberts, OED Forrest Page, Med School Admin. Chris Osmond, OED Taylor J. Stone Jennifer Faye Orr, student Alan Glenn Woodruff, student David Gregg, student Kyle Knierim, student Stephen Chaney Biochemistry and Biophysics Andres Crowley, student Kurt Gilliland, Cell & Development Biology	Members Julie Byerley, Pediatrics Jake Lohr,  Pediatrics Deb Bynum, Medicine Christopher Klipstein, Medicine Marion Couch, Otolaryngology Tony Lindsey, Psychiatry Annamarie Connolly, OB/GYN Robert Gwyther, Family Medicine James Yankaskas, Critical Care Alan Finkel, Neurology Chris Osmond, OED Cherri Hobgood, OED	Members
Minutes (Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher required) May 15, 2006 May 24, 2006 June 7, 2006 Aug. 22, 2006 Aug. 31, 2006	Minutes (Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher required)	Minutes (Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher required)
Implementation Plan

Supporting Materials

Articles and Presentations
	Arnold, L. Assessing Professional Behavior: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.Acad Med, 2002, 77(6):502-515. Marcus, E. Empathy, Humanism and the Professionalization Process of Medical Education. Acad Med, 1999 74(11):1211-1215.* Swick, HM et al. Teaching Professionalism in Undergraduate Medical Education, JAMA. 1999, 282 (9): 830 Sheldon, GF. Professionalisn, managed care and the human rights movement. Presidential Address.1998 Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons. 14-33. Papadakis, MA et al. Early Detection and Evaluation of Professionalism Deficiencies in Medical Students: One School's Approach Acad Med, 2001 76(11):1100-1106. Papadakis, MA et al. Unprofessional Behavior in Medical School Is Associated with Subsequent Disciplinary Action by a State Medical Board. Acad Med, 2004, 79(3):244-249. Swick, HM. Toward a Normative Definition of Medical Professionalism. Acad Med, 2000 75(6).:612-616. Ginsburg, S. et al. Context, Conflict, and Resolution: A New Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Professionalism Acad Med, 2000 75(10) Supplement: S6-S11. Papadakis, MA et al. A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Clinical Clerkships Operation Committee.Acad Med. 1999 74(9):980-90. * Lazarus CJ. The program for professional values and ethics in medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2000 12(4):208-11.* Project of the ABIM Foundation, ACP-ASIM Foundation, and European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2002 136 (3): 243-246 Professionalism: Expectation, Experience, Education. Group on Student Affairs Plenary. AAMC Annual Meeting. Washington, DC. Nov. 9, 2003. Papadakis, MA et al. Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School. NEJM, 2005 353(25):2673-2682.
Reports
	Embedding Professionalism in Medical Education: Assessment as a Tool for Implementation. Report from an Invitational Conference Cosponsored by the Association of American Medical Colleges and the National Board of Medical Examiners. Baltimore, MD. May 15-17, 2002. Assessment of Professionalism Project, Report from Association of Americal Medical Colleges Group on Educational Affairs. January 2002. Assessment of professionalism annotated bibliography. June 2004.
Other Resources
	Clinical Evolution Task Force - Overarching Clerkship Objectives for the Clinical Education of Medical Students Synthesis of GSA Professionalism evaluation survey June 2006 Dean Houpt on Professionalism Blank, L, Grant, N, Lespoir, H. Developing a Portfolio to Promote Self-Reflection and Chronicle Medical. Professionalism. part of ABIM Program for Continuous Professional Development, AAMC 2000 AAMC draft instrument for assessing professionalism ACGME General Competencies * Due to copyright restrictions, articles marked with a red asterisk (*) require a somid and password to access (this is your email user name and password).