What is the best initial treatment for elevated LDL-C ?
Edward M. Gardner 5/16/97
Case:
Routine Screening in a 45 y.o. female detects an
elevated LDL-C of 205. She has no other CAD risk factors.
Clinical Bottom Lines:
1. Lovastatin is more effective initial treatment
than a stepped care regimen (SC)
of cholesterol lowering agents.
2. SC saves money and may be appropriate for the patient who pays
out of pocket for prescriptions.
The Evidence:
An open label, intention to treat, RCT of 612
patients with increased cholesterol who received initial
tovastatin or a stepped care medical treatment plan for 1 year.
SC medications included niacin, bile acid sequestrants, and
finally lovastatin.
| lovastatin N=306 |
stepped care N=306 |
p | RRR | ARR | NNT | |
| % ach goal | 40 | 24 | <0.001 | 40% | 16% | 6 |
| % dec LDL | 22 | 15 | <0.001 | |||
| total cost | $786 | $453 | <0.001 | |||
| drug cost | $561 | $240 | <0.001 | |||
1. SC increased HDL by 8% vs 1% increase for
lovastatin at 1 year.(p<0.001)
2. A subgroup analysis showed that in patients who paid for their
prescriptions, decrease in LDL was 19% for SC and 16% for
lovastatin.
3. More patients in SC were bothered by side effects, 30%, vs 16%
for the lovastatin group.
4. The study tried to approximate conditions of a typical
out-patient clinicalpractice.
5. The study was open label.
6. The study was funded by Merck & Co., the makers of
lovastatin.
Reference:
Oster G. Borok GM, Menzin J. et al. Cholesterol-Reduction
Intervention Study
(CRIS). A randomized trial to assess effectiveness and costs in
clinical practice.
Arch Int Med. 1996;156:731-9.