Strategies for Assessing Student Knowledge and Performance

Tools Strengths Weaknesses Outcomes Assessed (Examples)

Selected Response
(MCQ’s, T/F, Extended Matching)

  • Efficient to administer
  • Electronic delivery/scored
  • Statistical quality Control
  • Large sample
  • Cueing (limited options)
  • Moderate authenticity
  • Difficult to write
  • Factual knowledge
  • Concepts
  • Analysis
  • Evaluation

Open-ended Questions/ Written assignments
(essay, SOAP notes, journals)

  • Easy to create
  • Electronic submission
  • Searched for key words
  • Assess organizational skills
  • Handscored-time consuming
  • Writing skill vs knowledge
  • Small sample
  • Consensus on ideal response
  • Problem solving skills
  • Creativity

Observation
(small groups, clinical, laboratory)

  • Somewhat realistic
  • Learner centered
  • Small or accidental sample
  • Intra and Inter-Rater
  • reliability
  • Interaction skills  
  • Professional skill

Authentic Assessment
(standardized patients)

  • Realistic
  • Equivalent instrument
  • Learner centered
  • Selected sample
  • Small sample
  • Logistics
  • Administrative cost
  • Real life situations
  • Problem solving skills
  • Clinical hands on skills

Self-Assessment
(AIMS)

  • Assess self-motivation to advance independent learning
  • No scoring needed
  • Monitoring time
  • Small sample
  • Doesn’t measure knowledge
  • All of the above
  • Ability to self direct

Office of Educational Development

5/02