{"id":2291,"date":"2008-03-06T15:36:34","date_gmt":"2008-03-06T20:36:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/dms\/fax-journal\/past-issues\/2005-2006-edition\/the-role-of-human-igg-donor-specific-antibodies-complement-activation-and-neutrophils-in-renal-graft-injury\/"},"modified":"2018-12-04T15:03:08","modified_gmt":"2018-12-04T20:03:08","slug":"the-role-of-human-igg-donor-specific-antibodies-complement-activation-and-neutrophils-in-renal-graft-injury","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/past-issues\/2005-2006-edition\/the-role-of-human-igg-donor-specific-antibodies-complement-activation-and-neutrophils-in-renal-graft-injury\/","title":{"rendered":"The Role of Human IgG\/Donor Specific Antibodies, Complement Activation, and Neutrophils in Renal Graft Injury."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- description --> <\/p>\n<p class='lead'>Original Article<\/p>\n<p>Medical Student: Andres X. Crowley<\/p>\n<p>Mentor: Kenneth A. Andreoni MD<\/p>\n<p>Specific Aim: There is a growing observation in the renal transplant literature that the<\/p>\n<p>appearance of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies, especially donor<\/p>\n<p>specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs), after solid organ transplantation, correlates with<\/p>\n<p>rapid loss of renal graft function. We and others hypothesize that upon kidney<\/p>\n<p>transplantation, some patients generate donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs).<\/p>\n<p>These antibodies may bind to donor tissue and create organ dysfunction through<\/p>\n<p>activation of complement. The complement system may either act alone to damage tissue<\/p>\n<p>directly or recruit neutrophils that release proteolytic enzymes causing allograft injury.<\/p>\n<p>To test this hypothesis, this study will 1) investigate the isotypes and subclasses of human<\/p>\n<p>immunoglobulin (DSA) found in the serum of patients with clinically and pathologically<\/p>\n<p>defined acute humoral rejections; 2) assess DSA activation of complement pathways<\/p>\n<p>(both classical and alternative) and neutrophil activation (note: part 2 of the original<\/p>\n<p>proposal was not completed due to time restraints when this draft of the results was<\/p>\n<p>submitted)<\/p>\n<p>Background and Significance: Both Acute and Chronic Humoral Rejection are now<\/p>\n<p>accepted as major contributors to renal and extra-renal allograft loss. Graft injury<\/p>\n<p>mediated by antibodies is clinically important during the early as well as late course post-<\/p>\n<p>transplantation. The improving ability of immunosuppressive medications to decrease<\/p>\n<p>the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection has direct correlation to short-term<\/p>\n<p>success in organ transplantation. Improvements in long term graft survival have been<\/p>\n<p>more difficult to achieve1. &#8220;Chronic rejection&#8221; and &#8220;chronic renal allograft nephropathy&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>are terms for renal graft long-term injury leading to fibrosis and graft dysfunction from a<\/p>\n<p>combination of immunological and non-immunological causes. Acute and chronic,<\/p>\n<p>cellular and humoral injuries are all well described in renal allografts. It has been<\/p>\n<p>observed for many years that the combination of acute cellular and humoral rejection has<\/p>\n<p>dismal renal graft outcome. <\/p>\n<p>In a recent review, Dr. Terasaki cites over 33 publications that associate the presence of<\/p>\n<p>HLA antibodies with acute and chronic rejection in kidney, heart, lung, pancreas, and<\/p>\n<p>liver grafts. The majority of studies have been in kidney graft recipients with a<\/p>\n<p>significant interest in highly sensitized cardiac recipients2. HLA antibodies of Class I and<\/p>\n<p>Class II origin that can be defined against the specific allograft of interest are termed<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Donor Specific Antibodies&#8221;. Detailed investigation of the actual DSA induced injury in<\/p>\n<p>the renal tissue has not been thoroughly explored. Whether cellular injury results in a<\/p>\n<p>byproduct of alloantibody production, or whether HLA antibody production causes direct<\/p>\n<p>renal injury, such as by endothelial activation of other mechanisms, needs to be defined3-<\/p>\n<p>7. <\/p>\n<p>Since acute and chronic humoral rejections are associated with the presence of HLA<\/p>\n<p>antibodies in the serum, we will seek to determine whether theses DSAs cause injury to<\/p>\n<p>the allograft. We have obtained serum from renal transplant recipients after a clinically<\/p>\n<p>and pathologically documented acute humoral rejection episode. We will define the<\/p>\n<p>subclass and subtypes of these donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs), attempt to<\/p>\n<p>demonstrate binding of these antibodies to donor tissue, and create an in-vitro model to<\/p>\n<p>investigate whether these antibodies activate complement and lead to neutrophil<\/p>\n<p>infiltration and subsequent tissue injury. Results obtained from the proposed studies<\/p>\n<p>should advance our understanding of humoral rejection and may help us develop novel<\/p>\n<p>treatments for renal graft recipients undergoing antibody-mediated graft injury.<\/p>\n<p>Materials and Methods:<\/p>\n<p>Sources of patient sera: Serial recipient serum samples and protocol renal graft biopsies<\/p>\n<p>have been collected from patients with and without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)<\/p>\n<p>treatment at UNC under IRB approved patient consent. In this set of initial experiments,<\/p>\n<p>the serum samples of 4 patients with clinically diagnosed acute humoral rejection were<\/p>\n<p>examined. Positive and negative controls were provided by One Lambda (Canoga Park,<\/p>\n<p>CA). <\/p>\n<p>Analysis of donor specific antibody (DSA) levels and IgG subclasses in the recipient<\/p>\n<p>sera: In order to determine the IgG subclass of the Donor Specific Antibodies present in<\/p>\n<p>each patient&#8217;s sera, the technique of flow cytometry was utilized. Sera samples from both<\/p>\n<p>pre- and post- allograft transplantation were initially analyzed using pooled FlowPRA<\/p>\n<p>HLA Class I and Class II Screening tests (One Lambda, Canoga Park, CA). Furthermore,<\/p>\n<p>mouse FITC-conjugated antibody fragments specific for human IgG total and IgG<\/p>\n<p>subclasses 1 through 4 (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham AL) were used instead of the<\/p>\n<p>FITC-conjugated anti-IgG-total provided by One Lambda. This initial set of assays<\/p>\n<p>allowed for a cost-effective approach to screen for the presence of IgG subclasses without<\/p>\n<p>having to determine the HLA specificity of each antibody. <\/p>\n<p>Once this set of screening assays was completed, it was possible to eliminate certain IgG<\/p>\n<p>subclasses from further analysis, and thus conserve serum and other key reagents. The<\/p>\n<p>post-transplant sera samples were then analyzed using FlowPRA Single Antigen Bead<\/p>\n<p>HLA Antibody Detection Tests for Class I and Class II. The appropriate FITC<\/p>\n<p>conjugated anti-IgG antibody fragments mentioned above were used again to determine<\/p>\n<p>the subclass of the Donor Specific Antibodies and the HLA-specific (non-Donor)<\/p>\n<p>antibodies in each serum sample. <\/p>\n<p>(The following descriptions of additional methods, which were listed in the original<\/p>\n<p>proposal, were not completed during this phase of the project due to time restraints but<\/p>\n<p>are currently being pursued in the laboratory of Dr. Zhi Lui at UNC-Chapel Hill:<\/p>\n<p>1) Detection and quantification of activated complement components in patients&#8217; sera, 2)<\/p>\n<p>In vitro determination of complement and neutrophil activation using Donor Specific<\/p>\n<p>Antibodies from patient sera, 3) Immunohistological staining of kidney graft tissue<\/p>\n<p>sections.)<\/p>\n<p>Results and Discussion:<\/p>\n<p>Patient 1 Summary (M.H.): IgG-1 positive for anti-DR 1, 103, 4, 7, 9, 15, 51, 53 ( ? &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>HLA class II) and IgG-3 positive for anti DR 1, 4, 7, 9, 53 ( ? -HLA class II) in post-op<\/p>\n<p>serum sample dated 7\/1\/2004 (with thymoglobin removed). The presence of ? -HLA class<\/p>\n<p>I specific antibodies of subclasses IgG-1 and IgG-3 were also detected during the initial<\/p>\n<p>screening assays, but the specificities of these antibodies were not determined due to<\/p>\n<p>limited sample aliquots. We focused only on defining the ? -HLA class II antibody<\/p>\n<p>specificities and subclasses for this patient&#8217;s sera.<\/p>\n<p>Patient 2 Summary (J.W.): IgG-1 positive for anti-DQ 5,6,8,9 ( ? -HLA class II) in the<\/p>\n<p>post-op serum sample dated 10\/4\/2004. No IgG-3 antibodies were detected. No ? -HLA<\/p>\n<p>class I specific antibodies were detected in the initial screening assays.<\/p>\n<p>Patient 3 Summary (L.R.): IgG-1 positive for anti-DR 1, 103, 4, 9, 7, 10, 51, 53 ( ? &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>HLA class II) and IgG-3 positive for anti DR 1, 103, 7, 53 and DQ 5 ( ? -HLA class II) in<\/p>\n<p>post-op serum sample dated 3\/22\/2005. In the initial screening assays, there was a<\/p>\n<p>significant presence of ? -HLA class I specific antibody in both samples, but only of the<\/p>\n<p>subclass IgG-1. Therefore, the specificities of these antibodies were not analyzed since<\/p>\n<p>the subclass, which was the variable in question, was already determined.<\/p>\n<p>Patient 4 Summary (J.K.): IgG-1 positive for anti-A 3, 8(BW6) ( ? -HLA class I) and<\/p>\n<p>IgG-3 positive for anti A 3, 8(BW6) ( ? -HLA class I) in post-op serum sample dated<\/p>\n<p>9\/13\/2002. In the initial screening assays, we detected ? -HLA class II specific antibody<\/p>\n<p>in both pre-op and post-op serum samples, but only of subclass IgG-1. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>specificities of these antibodies were not analyzed since the subclass, which was the<\/p>\n<p>variable in question, was already determined.<\/p>\n<p>The results obtained from this series of experiments confirm what has been reported in a<\/p>\n<p>related study performed by Kushihata,et al.8. We determined that the predominant IgG<\/p>\n<p>subclass that is produced during acute humoral rejection of a renal allograft is IgG-1. <\/p>\n<p>The subclass IgG-3 is also present to a lesser degree in some of the samples, and there is<\/p>\n<p>no detectable trace of IgG-2 or IgG-4 specific for any HLA type in the samples<\/p>\n<p>examined. This study is unique compared to the experiments of Kushihata, et al. in that<\/p>\n<p>we determined the IgG subclass of DSA detected in the sera of patients clinically<\/p>\n<p>diagnosed with acute humoral rejection, as opposed to those of patients who had high<\/p>\n<p>PRA values (ie high levels of HLA specific antibodies), but were not recipients of renal<\/p>\n<p>allografts. This distinction is important because the presence of HLA specific antibodies<\/p>\n<p>in the serum can be due to a variety of causes other than allograft transplantation, such as<\/p>\n<p>pregnancy and blood transfusion. The common finding, however, is that regardless of the<\/p>\n<p>source of sensitizing antigen, HLA antigen (both class I and class II) stimulates the<\/p>\n<p>production of IgG-1 and IgG-3 antibody, but does not stimulate the production of IgG-2<\/p>\n<p>and IgG-4. <\/p>\n<p>The significance of this finding is related to the intrinsic properties of the different IgG<\/p>\n<p>subclasses. IgG-1 and IgG-3 are very effective with regards to complement activation,<\/p>\n<p>whereas IgG-2 is not as effective, and IgG-4 does not bind complement at all9. <\/p>\n<p>Considering the activation of complement may lead to tissue injury by both lytic and<\/p>\n<p>inflammatory pathways9, 10, it is not surprising that these patients experienced symptoms<\/p>\n<p>of acute graft dysfunction. <\/p>\n<p>References<\/p>\n<p>1. Meier-Kriesche HU SJ, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B. Lack of improvement in renal<\/p>\n<p>allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most<\/p>\n<p>recent era. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:378-383.<\/p>\n<p>2. Teraski P. Humoral theory of transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003(3):665-673.<\/p>\n<p>3. Bian H HP, Mulder A, Reed EF. Anti-HLA antibody ligation to HLA class I molecules<\/p>\n<p>expressed by endothelial cells stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation, inositol phosphate<\/p>\n<p>generation, and proliferation. Hum Immunol. 1997(53):90-97.<\/p>\n<p>4. Harris PE BH, Reed EF. Induction of high affinity fibroblast growth factor receptor<\/p>\n<p>expression and proliferation in human endothelial cells by anti-HLA antibodies: a<\/p>\n<p>possible mechanism for transplant atherosclerosis. J Immunol. 1997(159):5697-5704.<\/p>\n<p>5. Liu C WK, Shi C, Heyner S, Komm B, Haddad JG. Post-transcriptional stimulation of<\/p>\n<p>transforming growth factor beta 1 mRNA by TGF-beta 1 treatment of transformed human<\/p>\n<p>osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 1996(11):211-217.<\/p>\n<p>6. McKenna RM TS, Terasaki PI. Anti-HLA antibodies after solid organ transplantation.<\/p>\n<p>Transplantation. 2000(69):319-326.<\/p>\n<p>7. Russell PS CC, Winn HJ, Colvin RB. Coronary atherosclerosis in transplanted mouse<\/p>\n<p>hearts. II. Importance of humoral immunity. J Immunol. 1994(152):5135-5141.<\/p>\n<p>8. F. Kushihata JW, A. Mulder, F. Claas, J.C. Scornik. Human Leukocyte Antigen<\/p>\n<p>Antibodies and Human Complement Activation: Role of IgG Subclass,<\/p>\n<p>Specificity, and Cytotoxic Potential. Transplantation. October 15, 2004<\/p>\n<p>2004;78(7):995-1001.<\/p>\n<p>9. Baldwin WM 3rd PS, Brauer RB, Daha MR, Sanfilippo F. Complement in organ<\/p>\n<p>transplantation. Contributions to inflammation, injury, and rejection.<\/p>\n<p>Transplantation. March 27, 1995 1995;59(6):797-808.<\/p>\n<p>10. Saadi S PJ. Endothelial cell responses to complement activation In: Volanakis JE,<\/p>\n<p>Frank MM, eds. The human complement system in health and disease. New York,<\/p>\n<p>Marcel Dekker. 998 1998:335.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Original Article Medical Student: Andres X. Crowley Mentor: Kenneth A. Andreoni MD Specific Aim: There is a growing observation in the renal transplant literature that the appearance of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies, especially donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs), after solid organ transplantation, correlates with rapid loss of renal graft function. We and others hypothesize &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/past-issues\/2005-2006-edition\/the-role-of-human-igg-donor-specific-antibodies-complement-activation-and-neutrophils-in-renal-graft-injury\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about The Role of Human IgG\/Donor Specific Antibodies, Complement Activation, and Neutrophils in Renal Graft Injury.\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80868,"featured_media":0,"parent":2236,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-2291","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","odd"],"acf":[],"_links_to":[],"_links_to_target":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/80868"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2291\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/dms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}