{"id":2378,"date":"2019-04-08T15:44:31","date_gmt":"2019-04-08T19:44:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/ngrrc\/?page_id=2378"},"modified":"2020-08-11T12:00:03","modified_gmt":"2020-08-11T16:00:03","slug":"educational-information-and-resources-for-non-scientists","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.med.unc.edu\/ngrrc\/resources\/educational-information-and-resources-for-non-scientists\/","title":{"rendered":"Educational Information and Resources for Non-scientists"},"content":{"rendered":"

Educational Information and Resources for Non-scientists<\/h2>\nOur bodies are inhabited inside and out with trillions of micro-organisms, termed our microbiota<\/strong><\/a>. Our microbiota is made up of bacteria, fungi, viruses, etc. that are often difficult to culture outside of their native environment (i.e. our body sites). Luckily, technological advances in sequencing technology have enabled us to learn about these microbes by assessing their genomic content through DNA and RNA sequencing<\/a>. These methods can inform us about the identity and function of the microbes, as well as potential culture conditions that will permit their growth. Bacteria<\/a> have been the best studied among the microbiota.<\/p>\n

Generally speaking, we participate in a symbiotic relationship<\/a> with our microbiota. Some refer to our microbiota as our \u201cnatural flora\u201d.\u00a0 The communities of microbes differ by body site, based upon that body site\u2019s environmental conditions and function.\u00a0 For example, bacteria inhabiting the skin are usually aerobic, whereas bacteria inhabiting the gut are anaerobic<\/a>. While our microbiota has evolved a mutually beneficial relationship with us, environmental disruption (antibiotics, pathogen exposure, host genetic susceptibility, etc.) can turn a good community bad. Because we harbor such complex populations of micro-organisms, it can be difficult to determine which changes are actually the cause of a particular health condition vs. which are a response.\u00a0 Human studies are a powerful way of demonstrating associations between health conditions and the microbiota, but animal studies are often necessary to demonstrate a causal relationship. There are many benefits of using animal models to study the microbiota, some of which include the ability to:\u00a0 Examine the microbiota over time, including before and after disease; Manipulate the microbiota by adding in or taking away select species; End an experiment at the peak of disease to study internal tissues.\u00a0But how can we determine if specific microbial species or communities of microbes actually cause disease if our experimental mice already have a microbiota?\u00a0How do we exclude changes to the existing microbiota?<\/p>\n

Germ-free mice are a specialized experimental system that lacks all known types of micro-organisms. They are born and raised in tightly controlled isolation bubbles or boxes and remain sterile by using strict husbandry protocols and microbiological testing regimens.\u00a0 Mice are not the only animal models that have been derived germ-free, but they currently the most abundantly used.\u00a0 Germ-free mice may be examined in relation to their \u201cconventionally\u201d housed counterparts, or they may be colonized with defined microbes \u2013 termed gnotobiotics.\u00a0Germ-free and gnotobiotic technology has been critical for scientists to demonstrate causal relationships between the native flora and health or disease states. For example, gnotobiotic techniques have helped us better understand the causes of obesity. Delores Garcia-Arocena, PhD, posted an interesting article on the Jackson Laboratory Blog<\/a>\u00a0on this subject.<\/p>\n

Some applications of germ-free and gnotobiotic mice include:<\/p>\n