Biostatistics Resources
GITHUB
Visit the UNC CFAR Biostatistics GitHub at https://github.com/unc-cfar-bios.
Tools
R package for Serial Limiting Dilution Assay Statistics (SLDAssay)
Power Calculator for Repeated Low-Dose Challenge Studies
R Package for Rank-Sum Power Calculation (wmwpow)
Brief Statistical Safety Checklist
Purpose:
This checklist is designed to help review draft manuscripts, statistical reports, or analysis plans
Methods:
- Objective / hypotheses of the study are clearly stated
- Endpoints are defined, declare endpoints as primary, secondary, and exploratory as appropriate
- Exposures and covariates are defined
- Sample size calculation is explained (if applicable)
- If applicable, randomization and blinding process are explained
- If applicable, interim stopping guidelines are described
- All statistical methods are described (with references as needed)
- Methodological assumptions were reasonably met
- Reasonable considerations were made for:
- missing data or attrition (e.g. loss to follow-up)
- multiple testing or multiple comparisons
- correlation among observations (e.g. longitudinal or clustered data)
- small sample sizes (e.g. n<30)
- Statistical software and version used are stated (e.g. SAS version 9.3, Cary, North Carolina)
- Statistical type I error probability is declared (e.g. two-sided alpha of 0.05)
- Clinical trials: trial registration ID included (www.clinicaltrials.gov)
Results (including text, tables, figures):
- Number of decimal places reported appropriately reflects measurement precision
- Summaries of variability/spread are provided (e.g. SD, IQR)
- Sample sizes are provided (n=) and missing data are declared when applicable
- Each p-value is accompanied by a graphical display of data and descriptive statistics. Estimation with precision quantified (e.g., 95% confidence interval) is preferred.
- If reporting p-values, report specific p-values (p=0.027), rather than p<0.05
- Use of the word significant should be avoided
- Figures are clearly explained by a legend and all axes and symbols are appropriately labeled
- Distorted effect sizes (e.g. by truncation of y-axis) are clearly labeled and justified
- Units of measurement are stated
Discussion:
- Discussion conclusions are in agreement with results
- Limitations of the study design or analytic approach are appropriately stated
For more guidance, refer to standard reporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, STARD) and the ASA p-value statement (and published updates thereof)
This list was compiled with reference to ‘Instructions for Authors’ at JAMA, Annals of Internal Medicine, Nature, and Science Magazine.